The History Channel, That's Impossible series, episode 6 entitled Mind Control
August 11, 2009, at 10 pm pst, posted here :
Miracle technology could allow people to transmit their brainwaves and speak to each other mind-to-mind. Scientists are working to create computers that read thoughts to find terrorists, and machines to scan our minds like thumbprints--causing some to wonder if "thought theft" could become the crime of the future.
Also to be available on iTunes.
The summary is what I discussed at my interview for the program. This is a very brief and limited overview of a 30 page paper that will include full citations and that will be posted on my website soon. The summary is here and is entitled: U.S. secrecy methods for mind control weapons have fooled almost everyone.
IV. The fourth section presents a comparison of two scientific cultures, the scientific culture surrounding the atomic bomb, and the scientific culture surrounding mind control weapons. Eileen Welsome won the Pulitzer Prize for her 1999 book Plutonium Files, America's Secret Medical Experiments in the Cold War. Welsome wrote about the atomic bomb scientific culture;
"[There was a] pervasive deception that the doctors, scientists, and military officials routinely engaged in even before the first bomb had been detonated. General Leslie Groves director of the Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb lied egregiously when he testified to Congress in 1945 about radiation effects of the bomb."
The deceptive scientific culture among the atomic bomb scientists is similar to the deceptive scientific culture among mind control scientists. For example, it can be shown that the prominent physicists Richard Garwin and Freeman Dyson, the CIA director Stansfield Turner, and National Research Council (NRC) chairman, Christopher Green, have wittingly or unwittingly made deceptive statements about mind control weapons research. Any trust in official statements by experts and government officials about mind control weapons ought to be seriously examined and questioned, but so far, this hasn't happened.
One fact that Ms. Welsh perhaps fails to mention in her summary is something that was discussed here in the past and should be quite obvious to researchers. I've not read the entire paper, so she may have written about this in the full version:
...the Pentagon is at least [ten to] twenty years ahead of the consumer market technologically in terms of prototypes, has spent millions on black budget exotic and 'non-lethal' information and other similar weapon systems and quite possibly has a separate division for R&D (not including DARPA) in this area [electronic warfare].
This information is implied in her comparison of mind control weapons development to the building of the atomic bomb. However, it is quite often necessary to make such information blatantly clear in order to surmount the vast psychological dividing walls layered within the psyche of the 'unconscious' fascist target.
The information regarding the technological advancement of the Pentagon versus the civilian consumer market was verified by a person I informally interviewed in 2007 who claimed to be a special operations mercenary for a U.S. intelligence service.
Additionally, I know from first hand experience that Remote Neural Monitoring is a reality. I have "witnessed" the operational capabilities of this technology and they were later "verified" by an acquaintance - probably a covert asset for a US domestic and foreign intelligence agency. More on this later.
The pretext is counter terrorism, however, the more profound reality indicates a direction toward the creation of a remote technological infrastructure to command and control the consciousness of the current post-human and the future trans-human. One investigating these matters really needs to look at the entire unspeakably horrific bricolage - of which mind control is only a partial component. The other components have been extensively researched and archived here in the past: eugenics, genomics, biotechnology, cybernetics, trans-humanism, genetically modified food, the Global Genome, IBM "Life Sciences", infomorphs, artificial intelligence, etc.